Climate change hoax continues - Northwest Chatter - Explorer

back Side Panel

Climate change hoax continues

1 image

Richard D. Brinkley

Posted

Just as the purpose of Obamacare was not to provide quality healthcare to more people (indeed, it achieved just the opposite), the strategy of climate change has nothing to do with the climate, hot or cold.

The purpose of both programs is bigger supreme state government and control over the population. Both programs involve massive taxation of the people.  Both programs are built on the serial lies of Obama and his minions. Just remember, the bigger the government, the smaller the people.

In October 2013, the United Nation’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reported that it is “95 percent certain that humans are causing climate change.”  

The CorbettReport.com analyzed the “95 percent” claim. The IPCC used a “likelihood scale” that assigns percentages to various phrases, ranging from “exceptionally unlikely” to “virtually certain.”  It smacks of a “guesstimate” of sorts or worse. As Charles Krauthammer wrote, “If climate science is settled, why do its predictors keep changing?”

When it comes to deciding that climate change is manmade, science goes out the window. “According to the IPCC: “The approaches used in detection and attribution research cannot fully account for all certainties, and thus ultimately expert judgment is required to give a calibrated assessment of whether a specific cause is responsible for a given climate change.’”

As James Corbett concluded, “the ‘95 percent probability that is making all the headlines is nothing more than an arbitrary number decided on in closed door meetings between the report authors.”  In other words, it is questionable political opinion presented as scientific fact by neo-progressive religionists intent on one world government.

In 2012, 50 NASA scientists and experts, with more than 1,000 years of combined professional experience, sent a letter to the NASA Administrator, stating that the Goddard Institute for Space Studies’ and NASA’s claims that man-made carbon dioxide is having a catastrophic impact on global climate change are not substantiated in light of thousands of years of empirical data.  

The letter further stated that hundreds of well-known climate scientists and tens of thousands of other scientists further decried NASA’s fool-hardy statements under the Obama administration. Obviously, the science is not settled, as claimed by Obama and his climate religion disciples.

The “Global Warming Petition Project” has 31,487 scientists that have signed a petition to reject the global warming, stating “There is no convincing evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth’s atmosphere and disruption of the Earth’s climate. Moreover, there is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce many beneficial effects upon the natural plant life and animal environments of the earth.”

The entire gambit of climate change is one world government. Al Gore, the primary neo-progressive zealot for climate change, talked about one world government early on.  Neo-progressive religionists of the world talk about climate change and one world government in the same breath. Ban Ki Moon, Secretary of the United Nations, constantly refers to a global governance structure with a global carbon tax at the core. This is the real target of the neo-progressive religionists.

There it is, the Gospel according to Gore: the notion of a corporatist alliance of big government and big business (fascism) with the false promises of social justice and equal outcomes for all (socialism). State supremacy, social control and massive distrust of government are the by-objectives of today’s neo-progressive religionists.

In the end, carbon dioxide, CO2, is nothing less than the “food” that sustains and nourishes all plant life on earth and in the oceans, and, as a result of photosynthesis, gives off oxygen, which humans need to survive.

John Podesta, White House Advisor, stated there is overwhelming evidence climate change is affecting people. Where is that evidence? When will the neo-progressives produce their evidence? Everything they have submitted as evidence so far, to include the so-called hockey stick graph, has been proven false and fabricated.

1 image

Richard D. Brinkley

Close