The power of PACs - The Explorer: Northwest Chatter

The power of PACs

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Wednesday, February 19, 2014 4:00 am

While there seems to be more talk about the 2016 presidential election than the 2014 mid-term elections, make no mistake this year’s races are very important.

However, they are also going to be just a preview of how nasty the presidential race will be with Republicans, Democrats and those unnamed special interest groups slinging mud and avoiding the true issues we here in America are facing.

Why is avoiding the issues easy for today’s candidates? The answer is easy – money. The Supreme Court’s narrow decision to uphold Citizen’s United in 2010 allowed unnamed sources to purchase ads, donate money and buy candidates.

So much of a candidate’s time now is sponsoring fundraisers, buying votes and ignoring the needs of everyday Americans.  

In the Feb. 11 Op-ed posted on CNN, Ben and Jerry’s co-founder Ben Cohen and Communications Workers of America president Larry Cohen had some good points of how money has taken the “We the people” power out of election results.

“Many Americans are becoming convinced that their votes don’t count, that our political process is controlled by the biggest bankroll, and that money, not the public interest, sets policies and priorities in government,” Cohen said in the Op-ed. “Big money gives a big voice to the wealthy and corporations, at the expense of the rest of us. It threatens the democratic voice that is the foundation of our country. Freshman representatives in Congress are asked to spend nearly half their time raising money, many providing special interests can afford to pay $5,000 a plate for politicians’ fundraising breakfasts, or for such things as ski trips, pheasant hunts and luxury golf tournaments.”

Currently, individual donor contributions are capped at $123,000, which is more than double the median family income in America. Regular, hardworking American cannot compete with that, which means we essentially do not matter once a candidate starts looking at what they need to do to win.

While I don’t agree with House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi often, I do agree with the reasoning for her and Rep. John Sarbanes, D-Maryland, to introduce H.R. 20, the Government by the People Act, which was officially introduced last week.

Super PACs took hold of this country, bought elections and even though Pelosi opponents will try to find every reason in the world to hate this bill, it is good for America.

According to recent reports filed with the Federal Election Commission last week, super PACs raised more than $140 million last year. That is $41 million more than what groups raised in 2011. There is something wrong when PACs are raising more than $40 million more in a non-presidential election year.

This is happening on both sides of the aisle. Former Rep. Gabrielle Giffords’ PAC, Americans for Responsible Solutions, raised $12.5 million in 2013. That kind of money can sway a lot of politicians to look at the PAC’s cause to force more background checks for guns and improve gun legislation.

According to a Huffington Post report, billionaire investor Tom Steyer donated $11.1 million to PACs working to fight climate change.

These PACs are buying our politicians and what have we got for it so far? The current Congress is the least productive on record. They do not answer to the people, and PACs are only going to allow that continue.

HR 20 addresses a lot of the these issues by encouraging the participation in everyday Americans.

Key provisions in the bill include:

Provide a refundable $25 My Voice Tax Credit.

Establish Freedom from Influence Matching Funds to boost the power of small-dollar contributions.

Provide candidates with an opportunity to earn additional resources in the homestretch of a campaign so that the voices of the people are not drowned out by big money.

At the end of the day, we should remember this is  not a partisan issue facing our elections, it’s an American issue.

© 2014 The Explorer. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Welcome to the discussion.

1 comment:

  • John Flanagan posted at 9:37 am on Wed, Feb 19, 2014.

    John Flanagan Posts: 333

    Political Action Committees (PAC's) are not inherently corrupt, but since politics involves deals and backroom decisions, the system itself can be and often is corrupted and influenced by money. However, before the word PAC was thrown around by the media as if it were a bad thing, American politics was always rough and tumble, and struggles must take place in a free society.
    For example, in New York, where I was born and raised, each election is usually influenced by strong and partisan teacher unions, police and fire unions, private sector labor unions, industry lobbyists, various groups. Everyone expects that groups like Planned Parenthood will support candidates who are pro-abortion, while people like myself support only pro-life candidates through our own organizations or PAC's, if you will. Gay marriage supporters have their PAC's, while I support national organizations which stand for traditional marriage between one man and one woman only. Does my Christian faith determine whom I will support and what organizations I would donate to? You bet it does. Are those with views opposed to mine support their own candidates and PAC's? Of course they do.
    I do not agree with those who claim elections are "bought" by PAC's and their influence. People generally vote for those whom they agree with ideologically, and oppose those whom they disagree with in the political arena. Right or wrong, and with a mix of uninformed voters and one party partisans, the elections go on. Accusing some PAC's of being corrupt, while giving unions, liberal groups, black caucus PAC's, and media partisans a free pass is wrong. We may be a chaotic nation of individuals in the political sphere, but most everyone gets a seat at the table.
    Of course, the issue of political power can and will be abused, but this is why our republic requires openness. In the future elections, with social media, and target groups on twitter, the whole process will become even more volatile.

     

Oro Valley Audiology

Oro Valley AudiologyAddress: 2542 E Vistoso Commerce Loop Rd, Oro Valley, AZ 85755Phone:(520) ...

MOS: Halloween

We asked the community about Halloween!

MOS: Ebola Virus

We asked the community about the Ebola Virus.

More Featured Videos

Oro Valley Audiology

Oro Valley AudiologyAddress: 2542 E Vistoso Commerce Loop Rd, Oro Valley, AZ 85755Phone:(520) ...

Spacer4px

Follow us on Facebook