U.S. Rep. Ron Barber criticizes leadership for pulling critical appropriations bill - Tucson Local Media: News

U.S. Rep. Ron Barber criticizes leadership for pulling critical appropriations bill

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Ron Barber

Posted: Thursday, August 1, 2013 1:38 pm

U.S. Rep. Ron Barber today sharply criticized House leaders for failing to move forward with an appropriations bill for the departments of Transportation and Housing and Urban Development.

 

Barber had proposed an amendment to the bill to set aside $1 million to help America’s 62,000 homeless veterans. It was the second consecutive year Barber has sought to amend legislation to provide shelter for veterans who are homeless.

 

“I am deeply disappointed that House leadership today abruptly pulled from consideration this critical funding legislation,” Barber said. “Although I did not agree with all the measures in the bill, it is our job as representatives to, at the very least, have a debate and an up-or-down vote. That’s what the people sent us here to do: to vote and to move forward through the process toward a responsible budget.”

 

Barber said he agreed with Rep. Hal Rogers, an Alabama Republican and chairman of the House Appropriations Committee, who said he was “extremely disappointed” with the decision to pull the appropriations bill from consideration.

 

Yesterday, Barber introduced an amendment to the legislation that would have provided $1 million for rental assistance housing vouchers given to homeless veterans. The additional spending would have been offset with $1.5 million in administrative cuts.

 

“At a time when our country needed them, they answered the call, personally sacrificing for the greater good – for our greater good,” Barber told members of the House when he introduced his funding amendment. “We owe these individuals more than just a debt of gratitude. We owe our veterans our unflagging support commensurate with their level of service – equal to their sacrifice for me and for you and for everyone else who enjoys the freedoms they ensured.”

 

The request was supported by numerous organizations including the Veterans of Foreign Wars, American Legion, Vets First, Military Officers Association of America, United Spinal Association, Military-Veterans Advocacy Inc., Disabled American Veterans, Service Women’s Action Network, Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America and the Association of the United States Navy.

 

Because the legislation was pulled from consideration, the amendment was not voted upon. Last year, Barber also sought to have funding to assist homeless veterans added to the annual appropriation for the departments, but was unsuccessful.

 

Barber is a member of the Veterans Jobs Caucus and has a local Veterans Advisory Council that advises him on legislation affecting veterans. His Southern Arizona district is home to about 85,000 veterans. Few of the nation’s congressional districts have a heavier concentration of veterans.

 

“In my home district in Tucson, the city is working diligently to ensure veteran homelessness is eradicated permanently,” Barber said yesterday. “I applaud and support their efforts – but more can be done. If my amendment is adopted, it would increase by $1 million the amount available to veterans for housing vouchers.”

 

Barber noted that nearly-one-third of chronically homeless people are veterans, according to the United States Interagency Council on Homelessness.

 

Barber has been a champion for veterans-related issues since he has been in Congress. Earlier this month, the House Committee on Veterans Affairs subcommittee on health heard testimony on Barber’s Veterans Transportation Service Act, which will help veterans access needed medical care.

 

Among the many other pieces of legislation Barber has introduced to benefit veterans is a bill that will provide employers with a tax credit for hiring recently discharged veterans. And he introduced the Veterans Health Access Act that will improve access to health care by making it easier for veterans to be treated by private doctors in their communities.

 

He also cosponsored the Vulnerable Veterans Housing Reform Act to expand access to housing assistance to injured, low-income wartime veterans and the Protecting Veterans’ Pensions Act, which will target financial companies that take advantage of veterans by selling them estate planning services and other financial products that prevent veterans from accessing their assets.

© 2014 Tucson Local Media. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

More about

More about

More about

Welcome to the discussion.

2 comments:

  • JimS posted at 3:50 pm on Fri, Aug 2, 2013.

    JimS Posts: 2

    America's Free War's and No Sacrifice for Those Who've Served In

    How does a Country HONOR It's Fallen, by Their Own 'Sacrifice' in Taking Care of the Brothers and Sisters They Served With!!

    "If military action is worth our troops’ blood, it should be worth our treasure, too — not just in the abstract, but in the form of a specific ante by every American." -Andrew Rosenthal 10 Feb. 2013

    Rachel Maddow: "We got a huge round of tax cuts in this country a few weeks before9/11. Once 9/11 happened and we invaded Afghanistan, we kept the tax cuts anyway.
    How did we think we were going to pay for that war? Did we think it was free?
    Then, when we started a second simultaneous war in another country, we gave ourselves a second huge round of tax cuts. After that second war started. The wars, I guess, we thought would be free, don`t worry about it, civilians. Go about your business." 23 May 2013

    “Why in 2009 were we still using paper?” VA Assistant Secretary Tommy Sowers “When we came in, there was no plan to change that; we’ve been operating on a six month wait for over a decade.” 27 March 2013

    WHY? GOOD QUESTION THOSE SERVED SHOULD ANSWER!

    "You cannot escape the responsibility of tomorrow by evading it today." - Abraham Lincoln

    USN All Shore '67-'71 GMG3 Vietnam In Country '70-'71

     
  • John Flanagan posted at 3:23 pm on Thu, Aug 1, 2013.

    John Flanagan Posts: 347

    Perhaps, Mr Barber and politicians on both sides of the aisle should demand separate votes on the individual measures of a given bill instead of having to support an entire bill or shelve it. When riders or addendums, as well as mandates, and controversial directives are included in a bill, as both parties often do while a bill is crafted in committee, it is sure to result in opposition from somebody. The extra requirements can be slipped in by either party, and this practice is deceptive and counterproductive. Do we wonder why some good laws don't pass simply because their are negative aspects which politicize the process.? This is not a good way to handle the people's business in Congress.
    One time in a suburb of NY, where I lived, the local school district attached the bus transportation funding to a larger controversial budget filled with fat and perks. When the voters turned it down, there were no buses for a week. The voters were incensed. The board was pressured to submit a separate budget for transportation alone and the district was never held hostage again to pass a budget filled with excessive spending. This can be done at the Congressional level, but only if both parties will finally get together and work for the interest of the people.


     

Featured Videos

Catalina Bighorn Sheep Releases

Arizona Game and Fish released 30 Bighorn Sheep in a 2-Day period into the Catalina Mountains ...

More Featured Videos
Spacer4px

Online poll

Follow us on Facebook